Re: Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw
Date: 2017-02-01 06:20:54
Message-ID: CAB7nPqToxwAb7ia8eLtkr25GPchrBrTnzEaT=yhLt=cnQ5UTBA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Attached is the new version of the patch. I also addressed other comments
> from you: moved rewriting the fdw_scan_tlist to postgres_fdw.c,
> added/revised comments, and added regression tests for the case where a
> pushed down UPDATE/DELETE on a join has RETURNING.
>
> My apologies for having been late to work on this.

Moved to CF 2017-03.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-01 06:23:04 Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-01 06:18:08 Re: Logical replication existing data copy