Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2017-11-29 02:16:49
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTiXaE0=5B3em+fSsBM1RSkYYorr1H9x-dgCkVqSKYi9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
> Postgres crashes:
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(((const void*)(&isNull) != ((void*)0)) && (scankey->sk_attno) > 0)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 466)
>
> May be I'm doing something wrong or amcheck support will go with different patch?

Usually amcheck complaining is a sign of other symptoms. I am marking
this patch as returned with feedback for now as no updates have been
provided after two weeks.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-29 02:19:44 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-29 02:14:05 Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering