| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow interrupts on waiting standby |
| Date: | 2017-03-31 06:47:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTiSSnv4EJGS_jqUn3mcN0U6C1i9n1DFpOv8Q1ERU9KQA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> I think you can call HandleStartupProcInterrupts() here, instead of checking postmaster death.
Oops, sorry for that, I quite mess up with this patch. The WaitLatch()
call should still have WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH so as it can leave earlier,
but yes I agree with your analysis that HandleStartupProcInterrupts()
as this is part of the redo work.
> Did Simon's committed patch solve the problem as expected?
Does not seem so, I'll let Simon comment on this matter...
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| standby-delay-latch-v6.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-03-31 06:50:28 | Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-03-31 06:27:18 | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |