On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 8 May 2015 at 13:02, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I think that we should redefine subxcnt as uint32 for consistency with
>> xcnt, and remove the two assertions that 924bcf4 has introduced. I
>> could get a patch quickly done FWIW.
>
> (uint32) +1
Attached is the patch. This has finished by being far simpler than
what I thought first.
Regards,
--
Michael