Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>
Cc: Ivan Kartyshov <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Date: 2017-11-30 03:40:50
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTfVQo1-Fa5dMr9vE1sfMR1YJS3fP_fkeeu5No0yd+VQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee> wrote:
> Robert made a good point that people will still rely on the token
> being an LSN, but perhaps they will be slightly less angry when we
> explicitly tell them that this might change in the future.

This thread has stalled, I am marking the patch as returned with
feedback as this is what looks like feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:41:42 Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:37:59 Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6