Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Date: 2017-11-30 03:41:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQFwwDTSzefjAep=XW1aeVbqXpCZ2Jk8UKSt5KUMo6rXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> After investigation, I found out that my previous patch was wrong
> direction. I should have changed XLogSendLogical() so that we can
> check the read LSN and set WalSndCaughtUp = true even after read a
> record without wait. Attached updated patch passed 'make check-world'.
> Please review it.

Moved to next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:44:16 Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:40:50 Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed