Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date: 2017-01-31 04:55:07
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTf0eSXM4HH4K4t5dvmwO8B5F+O_EuC-moMsgtWZDXmGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Moved to next CF with " needs review" status.

Same, to CF 2017-03 this time.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-31 05:05:59 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-31 04:48:39 Re: An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE