Re: Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h
Date: 2017-06-30 23:56:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTWY2TAa-aXxcjv3eTxCx6dVt43vBBtQXpi2vea94SYgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/27/17 01:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have noticed $subject. A patch is attached. Those comments are not
>> completely wrong either as pg_basebackup can generate pg_xlog as well,
>> still I would recommend to just mention "pg_wal".
>
> committed

Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-07-01 04:39:27 Re: Small comment fix in partition.c
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-06-30 22:20:43 Re: Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups