Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little
Date: 2015-12-18 07:35:59
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTUq6LsmqdrB5kJjJ09gnh+TdMo05uiKhSnwU+4d0xtpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Now per the two points listed in
>> the first sentence in this paragraph, perhaps this opinion is fine as
>> moot :) I didn't get much involved in the development of this code
>> after all.
>
> I'm concerned that Heikki's apparent unavailability will become a
> blocker to this.

Yeah, not only this patch... The second committer with enough
background on the matter is Andres.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-12-18 08:32:42 Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-12-18 07:31:15 Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little