| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fixes for a couple of resource leaks |
| Date: | 2015-07-13 01:36:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTTKHMON5tvOxgP=a1bqqK-yJmA-Pg_9_0pOHhbYf9mjg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Coverity is pointing out a couple of resource leaks:
>> ...
>> Attached is a patch to address all those things. Backpatches would be good
>> to have as well.
>
> I'll take this up, unless some other committer is already on it.
Thanks for taking up those things! Next time I'll mention as well
until which version each fix should be backpatched to facilitate
committer's work. That was obviously bad of me to not mention it.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2015-07-13 02:06:55 | Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-12 22:36:51 | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape |