Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date: 2017-09-19 23:00:25
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTSOHkTrAnY2mwhvSRMHrgGZNAQJCGPm34wd2ZBq-FYeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> To get things rolling, I have committed just the basic TAP tests, to
> give it a spin on the build farm. I'll work through the rest in the
> coming days.

Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2017-09-19 23:05:23 Re: Re: issue: record or row variable cannot be part of multiple-item INTO list
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-19 22:57:26 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test