Re: LSN as a recovery target

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: LSN as a recovery target
Date: 2016-08-20 13:41:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTR0ay-eHrMG7JNjH63nin_LaJJs-_qELdJ9sOTV3Ck2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> If we want to specifically name the recovery_target_lsn in the message, we
> could probably do it using context.

So that would be basically assigning error_context_stack for each item
parsed for recovery.conf? That seems a bit narrow as usually
recovery.conf is not that long..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-08-20 13:46:55 Re: [PATCH] Transaction traceability - txid_status(bigint)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-08-20 13:26:32 Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)