| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
| Date: | 2016-02-04 19:21:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTQN1Y9ByX-Xrc7ynFCG8g1_5H0U3G26Lyqr+r6NacwFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't in the end care very much about how we solve this problem.
> But I'm glad you agree that whatever we do to solve the simple problem
> should be a logical subset of what the full solution will eventually
> look like, not a completely different design. I think that's
> important.
Yes, please let's use the custom language, and let's not care of not
more than 1 level of nesting so as it is possible to represent
pg_stat_replication in a simple way for the user.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-04 19:40:11 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-02-04 19:17:55 | Re: [REVIEW] In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |