Re: Typos/Questions in bloom documentation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Typos/Questions in bloom documentation
Date: 2016-06-07 05:41:17
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTPD8EdXYT9iuCp6R+ZD5THM_qsqhdN3P-6py262BR-HA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:25 AM, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I agree it's unclear. Does the following make it any better (updated
>> patch attached):

I have sent a patch to rework the docs here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQB8dcFmY1uodmiJOSZdhBFOx-us-uW6rfYrzhpEiBR2g@mail.gmail.com
This may interest people here.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-07 05:46:16 Re: Problem with dumping bloom extension
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-07 05:35:28 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table