Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: "Rady, Doug" <radydoug(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Date: 2017-11-28 01:41:18
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTOkVhv9Q6z7st_RY0E962d5_63KLdS+P4CTSQJ5Fm5_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> Could you rebase the v11 patch?

This patch has been waiting for a rebase for more than three weeks as
of today, I am marking it as returned with feedback. It would be a
good idea to reply to Robert's input in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoYybNv-DdhVPMxLB2nx2SqeNJirtWHmdEAZUCGoTB2VBg@mail.gmail.com.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-28 01:43:10 Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-28 01:36:39 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?