Re: Sample configuration files

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Sample configuration files
Date: 2016-09-29 03:55:55
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTKH7GzeFAo2-eVTtymqiDQthfQanSCrHNORnJPo8OPLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So, anyone else have an opinion, pro or con?

Going through this thread, I'd vote -1. This is a documentation effort
mainly, and installing those files has zero effect if they are not
loaded via include_if_exists or include in postgresql.conf.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-09-29 04:53:02 Re: Handling dropped attributes in pglogical_proto
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-29 03:49:25 Re: WAL consistency check facility