| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
| Date: | 2014-09-10 03:42:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTHSzZxsSPZnW+tWjz0OiQimZ9DFDahCCrnyKKDaL-63Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> One regression failed on linux due to spacing issue which is
>> fixed in attached patch.
I just read the latest patch by curiosity, wouldn't it make more sense
to split the patch into two different patches for clarity: one for the
reclaimer worker centralized around BgMoveBuffersToFreelist and a
second for the pg_stat portion? Those seem two different features.
Regards,
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-09-10 04:39:47 | Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-09-10 03:31:21 | Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index |