| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Coverage improvements of src/bin/pg_basebackup and pg_receivewal --endpos |
| Date: | 2017-06-09 06:08:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTAzSpK5b322si5djGHSU0kRefkLuHj4RX7nkAwe-vi1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> While it is possible to tackle some of those issues independently,
> like pg_basebackup stuff, it seems to me that it would be helpful to
> make the tests more deterministic by having an --endpos option for
> pg_receivewal, similarly to what exists already in pg_recvlogical.
>
> Thoughts?
I have just played with that, and attached is a patch to implement the
so-said option with a basic set of tests, increasing code coverage of
pg_receivewal.c from 15% to 60%. I'll park that in the next CF of
September.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Implement-pg_receivewal-endpos.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2017-06-09 06:09:51 | Re: BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2017-06-09 06:07:26 | Re: Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for table which is already removed |