Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch
Date: 2016-11-07 04:36:45
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT7wgK96JUsiFANE1EHreCV68_gArrVGJeMnkNtzQ3Dpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The added regression test fails for the cases where the server is loaded
> with
> different pg_hba.conf rules during installcheck verification. Updated patch
> is
> attached with removing those tests.

That's not a full review as I just glanced at this patch a couple of seconds...

#include "utils/guc.h"
+#include "utils/jsonb.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
You don't need to include this header when using arrays.

Implementing a test case is possible as well using the TAP
infrastructure. You may want to look at it and help folks testing the
patch more easily with a set of configurations in pg_hba.conf that
cover a maximum of code paths in your patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-11-07 04:43:22 Re: Let's get rid of SPI_push/SPI_pop
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-11-07 03:36:18 Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch