Re: "make check" changes have caused buildfarm deterioration.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "make check" changes have caused buildfarm deterioration.
Date: 2015-07-21 11:58:15
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT7rGnPeRRbAEeGPnit_9=E=2SDcQQw-amaeyKtFeGL5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> > Regarding initdb.log and postmaster.log, this is definitely a bug.
>> > Those have been moved by dcae5fa from log/ to tmp_check/log/,
>> > tmp_check/ getting removed at the end of pg_regress if there are no
>> > failures counted. Both files will be saved in log/ at the location
>> > pg_regress is called using outputdir whose default is ".". This way
>> > behavior is similar to ~9.4. Attached is a patch to fix this for 9.5
>> > and master.
>>
>> Something I just noticed: an entry for log/ in test_ddl_deparse's
>> gitignore is missing.
>
> Well, three things: 1) the entry is not missing right now, but it will
> be missing if we apply your patch; 2) the file is inconsistent with the
> other test modules anyway so we might as well apply your patch to make
> them all alike; 3) we shouldn't really do anything about that until the
> other patch's fate is decided.

Well, just to be clear, I meant "with the previous patch I have attached".
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-07-21 12:44:50 Re: Selectivity estimation for intarray with @@
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-07-21 11:56:36 Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes