| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |
| Date: | 2017-08-21 12:51:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT5ov4roTKdvAAq4UhJ=QFeNT6QfmFjx4osY6x3MTf_zA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> With the tests directly in the patch, things are easy to run. WIth
> PG10 stabilization work, of course I don't expect much feedback :)
> But this set of patches looks like the direction we want to go so as
> JDBC and libpq users can take advantage of channel binding with SCRAM.
Attached is a new patch set, rebased as of c6293249.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Refactor-routine-to-test-connection-to-SSL-server.patch | application/octet-stream | 12.6 KB |
| 0002-Support-channel-binding-tls-unique-in-SCRAM.patch | application/octet-stream | 28.1 KB |
| 0003-Add-connection-parameters-saslname-and-saslchannelbi.patch | application/octet-stream | 16.0 KB |
| 0004-Implement-channel-binding-tls-server-end-point-for-S.patch | application/octet-stream | 16.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2017-08-21 12:59:29 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Text search configuration extension |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-08-21 12:30:51 | Re: Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Piyush Sharma | 2017-08-28 11:53:36 | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] 29f574: doc: Added quotes to URL in '@see' tag over org.po... |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-14 22:58:18 | Re: Statement-level rollback |