| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
| Date: | 2016-11-13 07:06:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT4PvZMsee8e=dqWn8ZUaUoYXN4pNEzGTTrPZFV04+gcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Could we name this something like wal_consistency_checking?
>
> Otherwise it sounds like you use this to select the amount of
> consistency in the WAL (similar to, say, wal_level).
Or wal_check? Or wal_consistency_check?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-13 09:18:41 | Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-11-13 05:40:12 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |