Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Cynthia Shang <cynthia(dot)shang(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Date: 2016-12-30 11:42:41
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT3a9MAmnK_HFzC+oDVnbAANvWwnN-dOy+0AAiG_X1+kA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> All backwards incompatible changes are judgement calls and people are
> certainly welcome to have different opinions. I have a pretty strong
> feeling about this particular change being worthwhile and also pretty
> long overdue.

The renaming is definitely worth it to be consistent with the new
pg_wal/. Now as in the case of those functions we have ways a simple
way to avoid useless pain to users we should really take it easy. So
introducing a set of aliases and deprecating them after a couple of
years is a fine plan IMO.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-30 11:45:08 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-12-30 11:10:38 Re: Broken atomics code on PPC with FreeBSD 10.3