Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Date: 2016-11-09 00:07:11
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT1Uoswh3UuV6CRC9G700HwHFLHSukrZ2-NoJrgiCNFMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Kyotaro Horiguchi set this patch to "Ready for Committer" in the
> CommitFest application, but that seems entirely premature to me
> considering that v2 has had no review at all, or at least not that I
> see on this thread. I'm setting it back to "Needs Review".

That's indeed too early. Thanks for correcting.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-09 00:14:17 Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-11-08 23:51:07 Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary