Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Date: 2017-02-13 05:46:30
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT1=yYTY7hee5XhJAcvL2EyAnP2k8ZBRQ+wuQKdgJfgsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> here is new update - check is done before any creating

It may be better to do any checks before dropping existing databases
as well... It would be as well just simpler to complain with a single
error message like "database and template list lengths do not match".
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-13 05:59:41 Re: contrib modules and relkind check
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-13 05:31:01 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0