Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting
Date: 2016-09-03 23:13:59
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT+6cr-yJJ8mTmd=N7gKs+TV8eO7UtHBccgKdGxEQ02WQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> One thing that has been irking me ever since I came to PostgreSQL is the
> fact that pg_ctl -w (and -W) don't have longhand equivalents. I like to
> use the long version in scripts and such as extra documentation, and
> I've never been able to with these. What's more, I keep forgetting that
> --wait (and --no-wait) aren't a thing.
>
> Trivial patch attached.

Nit: Like --nosync we could use --nowait, without an hyphen.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-04 00:04:20 Re: Transactional enum additions - was Re: Alter or rename enum value
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-03 23:05:25 Re: LSN as a recovery target