Re: SCRAM authentication, take three

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCRAM authentication, take three
Date: 2017-02-16 03:04:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSzgfe1DgcDg=auXTVyAvkbzs-j7GwU18gv9FJNrmxUiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Ah, found it. It was because of this change:
>
> Having two error codes with the same SQLSTATE is not cool, and tripped the
> assertion in PL/python. I removed the new error code, it was only used in
> one place, and ERRCODE_PROTOCOL_VIOLATIOn was more appropriate there anyway.

It seems that this one is on me. Thanks for looking at it.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-02-16 04:15:14 Re: Parallel Append implementation
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-16 02:44:28 Re: Parallel Index Scans