Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions
Date: 2017-11-29 04:59:49
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSzThPYDpv8n1rq8FUxtyg0uxCK5XC2TzfQgo24ffnAXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I'm a reviewer of this patch but I think I'm not allowed to mark
> this "Ready for Commiter" since the last change is made by me.

Yes, it is a better idea to wait for reviews here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-29 05:01:26 Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-29 04:57:48 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?