Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stéphane Schildknecht <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgres(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions
Date: 2015-06-16 00:36:17
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSy1q=4_887HR-jbn9Ydgewt4f4EgzSjbs8CY=nNCW2dA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:50 AM, damien clochard wrote:
> Well at least a PostreSQL core dump isn't lethal during 25 000 years :)

Hm? PG never has core dumps, it is too stable. You may be mistaking
with a bunch of other databases.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-06-16 11:31:08 USA open source conferences looking for Postgres talks
Previous Message damien clochard 2015-06-15 16:50:49 Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions