| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: some pg_rewind usability issues |
| Date: | 2015-09-17 20:43:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSx_osp-V3Xms_7V_-yPLTMJOgbnih1ProwmRaE5Y9Otg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's something that we discussed in this CF's patch to ease the
> handling of timeline switches when rewinding a node, I wouldn't have
> any objection to get that backpatched to 9.5 though (the
> DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY part I mean).
Independent patch attached FWIW (I'm sure you had the same though).
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 20150917_pgrewind_recovery.patch | text/x-diff | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-09-17 21:19:10 | Re: numbering plan nodes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-17 20:22:34 | Re: numbering plan nodes |