| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums |
| Date: | 2017-11-27 01:02:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSx_O8MW5TXoTqgKoyEc=tREP6+N5QQsqdnXTBnYV+Pdw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ... Would you think
>> that it is acceptable to add the number of index scans that happened
>> with the verbose output then?
>
> I don't have an objection to it, but can't you tell that from VACUUM
> VERBOSE already? There should be a "INFO: scanned index" line for
> each scan.
Of course, sorry for the noise.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-27 01:03:25 | Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-26 22:56:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables |