Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Cynthia Shang <cynthia(dot)shang(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Date: 2017-01-24 04:45:38
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSxK+M7rr4yo-4bszT2AkVY0pKAvpJxReHTAotkBqMAKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I agree that we could probably just go ahead and switch over to starting
> on the clog changes (there was agreement somewhere about the new name
> for that too), but, well, if I was someone watching all of this
> discussion, I have to admit I probably wouldn't be too excited starting
> on another set of name changes with all of this going on. Admittedly,
> the clog rename is a lot less user-facing and perhaps we should have
> started with it, but this is where we're at now.

There are no SQL-level functions and no binaries using the naming clog
or subtrans, so that's a good anti-complain start.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2017-01-24 04:48:29 Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-01-24 04:39:58 Re: Add pgstathashindex() to get hash index table statistics.