Re: auto_explain sample rate

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: auto_explain sample rate
Date: 2015-08-25 12:45:28
Message-ID: CAB7nPqStA9fSvJFSv=E_211RvskMyof86bSPf+hbzq6Q4-2F6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7 July 2015 at 21:37, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Well, I obviously missed that pg_srand48() is only used if the system
>> lacks random/srandom, sorry for the noise. So yes, random() must be
>> used instead of pg_lrand48().
>>
>> I'm attaching a new version of the patch fixing this issue just in case.
>
> Thanks for picking this up. I've been trying to find time to come back
> to it but been swamped in priority work.

For now I am marking that as returned with feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-08-25 12:48:10 Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-08-25 12:44:47 Re: Commitfest remaining "Needs Review" items