Re: Async execution of postgres_fdw.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Async execution of postgres_fdw.
Date: 2015-01-15 07:49:09
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSqu03EMdAfiZpSGqyYWWvPyhFLrjGTHrHXK4G5sHKT8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I'll look into the case after this, but I'd like to send a
> revised patch at this point.
Hm. Seems like this patch is not completely baked yet. Horiguchi-san,
as you are obviously still working on it, would you agree to move it
to the next CF?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-01-15 07:51:33 Re: Support UPDATE table SET(*)=...
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-01-15 07:41:48 Re: logical column ordering