| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting |
| Date: | 2016-09-08 00:00:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSkZi9WUts_uJj3bZ8CDtF8hVuAQiNRT9jHd4xwOWRQOw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Gavin Flower wrote:
>
>> possibly '--nosync' (& any similar) should have a '--no-sync' variation
>> added, with the '--nosync' variation documented as depreciated?
>
> I agree -- I would go as far as just documenting --no-sync only and
> keeping the --nosync one working with minimal (if any) visibility in
> docs.
Keeping no visibility at all in the docs, with an alias in the
binaries sounds fine to me if we want to standardize a bit more
things.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-08 00:05:45 | Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-07 23:56:31 | Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting |