Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
Date: 2016-06-21 00:26:33
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSjyEBrqrc3n8FRz7HwnKjfoffcr-bnbrD16njz1ypP=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> On 19/06/16 13:02, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>>> On 19/06/16 12:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Michael Paquier
>>>> Or in short the attached.
>>>
>>> The code looks good to me but why no documentation?
>>
>> Because that's a long day... Thanks! Now you have it.
>
> Thanks, this looks good. Could you please add it to the next commitfest
> so that it doesn't get lost and also so I can do an official review of it?

Yes, I just did that. That's too late for 9.6 anyway with beta2 close by.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2016-06-21 00:58:22 Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-06-20 23:47:06 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered