Re: coverage analysis improvements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: coverage analysis improvements
Date: 2017-08-21 05:23:02
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSgP_DBEUF_SBBsfYmHdKkJHrVdzcjACz_JAi4xZH411Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is a patch series with some significant reworking and adjusting of
> how the coverage analysis tools are run. The result should be that the
> "make coverage" runs are faster and more robust, the results are more
> accurate, and the code is simpler. Please see the individual patches
> for details.
>
> I have replaced "make coverage-html" with "make coverage" (but kept the
> previous name for compatibility), since the old meaning of the latter
> has gone away and was never very useful. Other than that, the usage of
> everything stays the same.
>
> I will add it to the commit fest. Testing with different versions of
> tools would be especially valuable.

Patch 0001 fails to apply as of c629324. Which versions of lcov and
gcov did you use for your tests?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-08-21 05:45:43 Re: Proposal: global index
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-21 05:11:44 Re: assorted code cleanup