| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is it time to kill support for very old servers? |
| Date: | 2017-11-03 12:30:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSfu_JE1tWgt7+J=3QjSDT302iTjM2DZ5ezVyJRt03GRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-10-16 16:59:59 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 9/20/17 04:32, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > Here's what I roughly was thinking of. I don't quite like the name, and
>> > the way the version is specified for libpq (basically just the "raw"
>> > integer).
>>
>> "forced_protocol_version" reads wrong to me. I think
>> "force_protocol_version" might be better. Other than that, no issues
>> with this concept.
>
> Yea, I agree. I've read through the patch since, and it struck me as
> odd. Not sure how I came up with it...
Andres, could you update the patch?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-03 12:34:01 | Re: SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-11-03 12:12:06 | Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE |