Re: [HACKERS] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations
Date: 2016-03-18 00:35:16
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSfUSMkD3ow5k0uHgqkyzFdMNDWkvtbDObvPUvyJ_VXOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
>> On 3/17/16 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The message I saw was post-1-March. If it was in fact submitted in
>>> time for 2016-03, then we owe it a review.
>
>> I meant to add the CF record and forgot:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/480
>> It was added 2016-01-13 by Michael Paquier.
>
> OK, so it looks like David's 10-Mar patch was actually just a repost of
> Michael's 28-Jan patch, which was already in the queue to be reviewed in
> 2016-03 (and hasn't yet been). So the addition to 2016-09 was simply
> erroneous and should be deleted.

My mistake I guess. I should have mentioned as well on this thread
that I registered it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-03-18 00:44:38 Re: Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-18 00:00:31 Re: Error: insufficient data in the message

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-03-18 00:37:56 Re: improving GROUP BY estimation
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2016-03-18 00:27:23 Re: typmod is always -1