Re: A design for amcheck heapam verification

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A design for amcheck heapam verification
Date: 2017-08-30 00:33:13
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSdxbmA3U2iP60P5kyBVEWZkeuP3HfR+kmRJxJYTkOTCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> It'd be nice to replace both with fls() or flsl(), though it's
> annoying to have to think about long vs int64 etc. We already use
> fls() in two places and supply an implementation in src/port/fls.c for
> platforms that lack it (Windows?), but not the long version.

Yes, you can complain about MSVC compilation here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-08-30 00:36:00 Re: [PATCH] Fix drop replication slot blocking instead of returning error
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2017-08-30 00:23:52 Re: error-handling in ReorderBufferCommit() seems somewhat broken