From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "lyes(dot)amd(at)gmail(dot)com" <lyes(dot)amd(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes |
Date: | 2017-12-11 04:25:22 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSaNoS_iz8m+kz8dOy8kpPiJgN3CpM+RbYLdLt+jbTyyA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/1/17, 3:04 PM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Seems entirely reasonable to me, provided that we only update the
>> extensible-options syntax:
>>
>> VACUUM [ ( option [, ...] ) ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
>>
>> I don't want to add any more options to the older syntax:
>>
>> VACUUM [ FULL ] [ FREEZE ] [ VERBOSE ] [ ANALYZE ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
>
> Right. This seems like the right path forward to me, as the
> VACUUM documentation states that the unparenthesized syntax is
> deprecated, and the DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING option was not added
> to the old syntax, either.
Yeah, the exact same discussion has happened when what has become
DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING was discussed for the freeze map.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-12-11 05:13:21 | Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-12-11 01:08:53 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14866: The generated constraint in the typed table causes the server to crash |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2017-12-11 04:49:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-12-11 04:07:39 | Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures |