Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2016-09-16 00:58:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSWtRhZDYuFVy5jBd8AOjdNiwwM8B9fazKArZs2Hd+rWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Yury Zhuravlev
<u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> Could it be possible to get a refreshed patch on this thread for at
>> least the sake of the archives? I'd really like to see somehting
>> happening here and do some progress for this CF.
>
>
> Sure, I will do it on Friday.
> Today I finished mingw+msys support. (mingw without msys has not passed some
> tests)

Okay. That sounds good to me. I don't recall what your patch is
exactly doing but could you still keep the vanilla Makefiles around?
This will reduce the diff of the patch, and we'd need anyway to keep
the former Makefile methods around until the buildfarm scripts are
updated, the animals do the switch and then get green. So a period
where both live in parallel is unavoidable.

I heard as well that MySQL is using cmake... It may be interesting to
see how they are integrating with it as a large project and avoid
their past mistakes.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-09-16 01:22:49 Re: patch: function xmltable
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-09-16 00:52:17 Re: [PATCH] Transaction traceability - txid_status(bigint)