Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Julian Markwort <julian(dot)markwort(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Valery Popov <v(dot)popov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
Date: 2016-12-17 22:48:48
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSSG-t68FPkRa=LvSUatXorXDDfD7hhB-qZxY-jGcUjyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> From the discussions of last year on -hackers, it was decided to *not*
>> have an additional column per complains from a couple of hackers
>> (Robert you were in this set at this point), ...
>
> Hmm, I don't recall taking that position, but then there are a lot of
> things that I ought to recall and don't. (Ask my wife!)

[... digging objects of the past ...]
From the past thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoY790rphHBogXMbTG6MzSeNdoxdBXebEkAet9ZpZ8gvtw@mail.gmail.com
The complain is directed directly to multiple verifiers per users
though, not to have the type in a separate column.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-12-17 22:54:04 Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-17 22:41:50 Re: Speedup twophase transactions