Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Date: 2015-10-06 15:12:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSJb3s=OPajs_e=0qQat9+00u4r+f7XSW2XrSa0MFKw7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something major here. But given that you're looking up
> solely based on Oid objnumber, Oid classnumber, how would this cache
> work if there's two foreign servers with different extension lists?

Oh. Nice catch here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-10-06 15:52:11 Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Previous Message YUriy Zhuravlev 2015-10-06 14:31:40 Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!