Re: Custom timestamp format in logs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Custom timestamp format in logs
Date: 2014-12-15 00:01:10
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSJVCceTi2F+CyOB9dKKY1fkA3eVGgmHmhH_mrpCTq5Ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This week, we heard about a user willing to use a custom timestamp
>> format across a set of services to improve the debugability of the
>> whole set, Postgres being one of them. Unfortunately datestyle does
>> not take into account the logs. Would it be worth adding a new GUC
>> able to control the timestamp format in the logs?
>>
>> We could still redirect the logs with syslog and have a custom
>> timestamp format there, but in the case of this particular user syslog
>> was a no-go. Looking at the code, timestamp format is now hardcoded in
>> setup_formatted_log_time and setup_formatted_start_time when calling
>> pg_strftime @ elog.c, so it doesn't seem to be much complicated to do.
>>
>> Opinions? This thread is here for that.
>
>
> A separate GUC seems kind of weird.
Check.

> Wouldn't it be better with something like %(format)t or such in the log_line_prefix itself in that case?
> That could also be expanded to other parameters, should we need them?
Possible. I am not sure if we will be able to have a new parameter in
log_line_prefix as modulable as timestamps for formatting though.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ali Akbar 2014-12-15 00:05:26 Re: [REVIEW] Re: Fix xpath() to return namespace definitions
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2014-12-14 21:53:38 Re: Commitfest problems