Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)
Date: 2015-02-13 09:12:23
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSGi-MR77B_y2Grq5gAavdEbK0kU=SzbYKrx7Stw2FL9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:

> > Where are we on this? AFAIK, we have now a feature with no documentation
> > and no example in-core to test those custom routine APIs, hence moved to
> > next CF.
> >
> Now Hanada-san is working on the example module that use this new
> infrastructure on top of postgres_fdw. Probably, he will submit the
> patch within a couple of days, for the upcoming commit fest.
>

I am a bit surprised by that. Are you planning to give up on the ctidscan
module module and

> Regarding to the documentation, a consensus was to make up a wikipage
> to edit the description by everyone, then it shall become source of
> SGML file.
> The latest one is here:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CustomScanInterface
>

OK. This looks like a good base. It would be good to have an actual patch
for review as well at this stage.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-13 09:16:50 Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-02-13 09:00:02 Re: "multiple backends attempting to wait for pincount 1"