Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> You could just add "as this allows to keep backup counters kept in
>> shared memory consistent with the state of the session starting or
>> stopping a backup.".
>
> Thank you for the suggestion, Michael-san. Attached updated patch.
> Please review it.

[nit]
+ * or stoppping a backup.
s/stoppping/stopping/
Fujii-san, please note that the same concept does not apply to
do_pg_start_backup().

* reason, *all* functionality between do_pg_start_backup() and
- * do_pg_stop_backup() should be inside the error cleanup block!
+ * do_pg_stop_backup(), including do_pg_stop_backup() should be inside
+ * the error cleanup block!
*/
Weirdly worded here. "between do_pg_start_backup until
do_pg_stop_backup is done" sounds better?

[/nit]
--
Michael