Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-11-15 05:34:13
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSB=M-=_GmZR_J5hv1X0m1VwibnrSJWC9zJS5+gSLD57A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 3) pg_xlogdump does not seem to work:
> $ pg_xlogdump 00000001000000000000000D
> pg_xlogdump: FATAL: could not find a valid record after 0/D000000
This one is a bad manipulation from my side. Please forget this comment.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-11-15 05:52:00 Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-11-15 05:12:55 Re: New storage parameter pages_per_range not mentioned in CREATE INDEX doc