Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date: 2014-12-05 15:06:23
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSAOyMoifdkrEFk1JxmhXcczgSi=ssk=yPaMKeMRXfP5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> I attempted quick review and could not come up with much except this
>
> + /*
> + * Calculate the amount of FPI data in the record. Each backup block
> + * takes up BLCKSZ bytes, minus the "hole" length.
> + *
> + * XXX: We peek into xlogreader's private decoded backup blocks for the
> + * hole_length. It doesn't seem worth it to add an accessor macro for
> + * this.
> + */
> + fpi_len = 0;
> + for (block_id = 0; block_id <= record->max_block_id; block_id++)
> + {
> + if (XLogRecHasCompressedBlockImage(record, block_id))
> + fpi_len += BLCKSZ - record->blocks[block_id].compress_len;
>
>
> IIUC, fpi_len in case of compressed block image should be
>
> fpi_len = record->blocks[block_id].compress_len;
>
Yep, true. Patches need a rebase btw as Heikki fixed a commit related to
the stats of pg_xlogdump.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message José Luis Tallón 2014-12-05 15:08:34 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-12-05 15:05:22 Re: advance local xmin more aggressively