On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> That's definitely not intended - it's supposed to be 16Mb. And it actually
> writes 16Mb to the tarfile, it's the extraction that doesn't see them. That
> also means that if you get more than one member of the tarfile at this
> point, it will be corrupt. (It's not corrupt in the .tar.gz case, clearly my
> testing of the very last iteration of the patch forgot to doublecheck this
> with both).
>
> Oops. Will fix.
If at the same time you could add some tests in pg_basebackup/t, that
would be great :)
--
Michael